OPENING LEADS |
(For all the card
combinations shown, clearly mark the card normally led if
different from the underlined card). |
Colour
this box if using non-standard leads |
v. suit contracts |
A K |
A K x |
K Q 10 |
K Q x |
K J 10 |
K 10 9 |
Q J 10 |
Q J x |
J 10 x |
10 x x |
10 9 x |
9 8 7 x |
10 x x x |
H x x |
H x x x |
H x x x x |
H x x x x x |
x x |
x x x |
x x x x |
|
v. NT contracts |
A K |
A K x |
K Q 10 |
K Q x |
K J 10 |
K 10 9 |
Q J 10 |
Q J x |
J 10 x |
10 x x |
10 9 x |
9 8 7 x |
10 x x x |
H x x |
H x x x |
H x x x x |
H x x x x x |
x x |
x x x |
x x x x |
|
Other agreements in leading, e.g.
high-level contracts, partnership suits: |
King requests unblock/count [against NT], count
[against suit contract] |
Ten not treated as an honour. |
CARDING METHODS |
|
Primary method v suit contracts |
Primary method v NT contracts |
On Partner's lead |
High
encourage, low discourage [unless lead is king] |
On Declarer's lead |
Count;
high/low shows even number. |
When discarding |
Revolving [low
cards not particularly significant] |
Other carding agreements, including
secondary methods (state when applicable) and exceptions to
above |
McKenney where
appropriate. |
|
SUPPLEMENTARY DETAILS
[2] |
2.1 |
2♣ followed by 3-either-minor shows
a weak hand with a 4-card major and a 6-card minor, and is to
play. |
2.2 |
2NT/3-major shows
4-card support, 7-loser/8-loser respectively. Responder may
re-transfer, etc. |
2.3 |
Rdbl and 2-level bids are weak
transfers to suit above the one bid [rdbl to 2♣].
Pass requests opener to redouble for pass or bid of lower 4-card
suit. |
2.4 |
After our 1NT is
overcalled, 2NT from responder asks opener to relay to 3♣,
then all bids are relatively weak. Cue-bids are Staymanic.
Cue-bids and 3NT deny stop if preceded by 2NT. Direct 3-level
suit bids are forcing. 3-level suit bids preceded by 2NT are to
play, but invitational if suit could have been bid at 2-level.
Double shows values for 2NT with at least Hxx in overcaller's
explicit or inferred suit |
2.5 |
Ogust 2NT over
2♥/2♠ |
3♣/3♦
= min HCP;
poor/good suit ['good' = 2 of top 3]
3♥/3♠
= max HCP;
poor/good suit. 3NT=AKQ of suit. |
2.6 |
3♣ is major-suit
enquiry:
3♥/3♠
show a 5-card suit,
3♦
promises one or both 4-card majors. If
responder also has a 4-card major he bids the other, or 4♦
with both. After
a 3♠
response, opener rebids 3NT with no minor-suit interest,
or Minorwood. |
|
|
|
Name: |
David Killick |
EBU No:
SBBC: |
68286 |
Partner: |
Nigel Lancaster |
EBU No: |
74784 |
GENERALISED DESCRIPTION OF
BIDDING METHODS |
Weak 2♦/♥/♠.
Weak No Trump. |
1NT OPENING AND RESPONSES |
Strength: |
12-14 |
Tick if
artificial and provide details below: |
¨ |
Shape constraints: |
May have any 5-card suit |
Tick if may have
singleton: |
¨ |
Responses: |
2♣ |
Stayman [promissory]
[see 2.1] |
Action after opponents double: |
Exit transfers [see
2.3] |
Action after other interference: |
Penalty-orientated double; Lebensohl [see 2.4] |
TWO-LEVEL OPENINGS
AND RESPONSES |
|
Meaning |
|
Responses |
|
2♣ |
8+ playing
tricks any suit , or 23+ balanced |
2♦ |
relay;
rebid non-forcing |
|
2♦ |
Weak, 5-9
NV, 6-10 Vul. Usually 6-card suit. Wider-ranging in 3rd
position. Constructive in 4th seat [10-13] |
2NT |
Ogust enquiry.
New suit is one-round force |
2.5 |
2♥ |
2♠ |
2NT |
20-22 |
3♣=5-card puppet
Stayman,
3♦/♥
are
transfers; 3♠=both
minors |
2.6 |
OTHER ASPECTS OF
SYSTEM WHICH OPPONENTS SHOULD NOTE |
4-card suits are bid up
the line. |
3rd-seat openings may be stretched. |
|
8 May 2019 |
|