OPENING LEADS |
(For all the card
combinations shown, clearly mark the card normally led if
different from the underlined card). |
Colour
this box if using non-standard leads |
v. suit contracts |
A K |
A K x |
K Q 10 |
K Q x |
K J 10 |
K 10 9 |
Q J 10 |
Q J x |
J 10 x |
10 x x |
10 9 x |
9 8 7 x |
10 x x x |
H x x |
H x x x |
H x x x x |
H x x x x x |
x x |
x x x |
x x x x |
|
v. NT contracts |
A K |
A K x |
K Q 10 |
K Q x |
K J 10 |
K 10 9 |
Q J 10 |
Q J x |
J 10 x |
10 x x |
10 9 x |
9 8 7 x |
10 x x x |
H x x |
H x x x |
H x x x x |
H x x x x x |
x x |
x x x |
x x x x |
|
Other agreements in leading, e.g.
high-level contracts, partnership suits: |
King requests count/unblock [against NT], count
[against suit contract] |
Ten not treated as an honour. |
CARDING METHODS |
|
Primary method v suit contracts |
Primary method v NT contracts |
On Partner's lead |
High
encourage, low discourage [unless lead is king] |
On Declarer's lead |
Count;
high/low shows even number. |
When discarding |
Revolving [low
cards not particularly significant] |
Other carding agreements, including
secondary methods (state when applicable) and exceptions to
above |
McKenney where
appropriate. |
|
SUPPLEMENTARY DETAILS
[2] |
2.1 |
2NT/3-major shows
4-card support, maximum/minimum respectively |
2.2 |
Bid shows suit bid
plus next higher suit, min 4-4. Pass forces redouble, which is
either passed, or 2-suit shows that suit plus higher,
non-touching suit. Redouble
is relay to 2♣
for pass or correct |
2.3 |
After our 1NT is
overcalled, 2NT from responder asks opener to relay to 3♣,
then all bids are relatively weak. Cue-bids are Staymanic.
Cue-bids and 3NT deny stop if preceded by 2NT. Direct 3-level
suit bids are forcing. 3-level suit bids preceded by 2NT are to
play, but invitational if suit could have been bid at 2-level.
Double shows values for 2NT with at least Hxx in overcaller's
explicit or inferred suit |
2.4 |
Ogust 2NT over
2♥/2♠
|
3♣/3♦
= min HCP;
poor/good suit ['good' = 2 of top 3] |
3♥/3♠
= max HCP;
poor/good suit. 3NT=AKQ of suit. |
2.5 |
3♣
asks for 5-card major. 3♦
rebid promises at least one 4-card major. If responder also has
a 4-card major, he/she bids the other, or 4♦
with both. |
|
|
|
Name: |
Bob Kozlowski |
EBU No:
SBBC: |
419076 |
Partner: |
Nigel Lancaster |
EBU No: |
74784 |
GENERALISED DESCRIPTION OF
BIDDING METHODS |
Weak 2♥/♠.
5-card ♠
suit. |
1NT OPENING AND RESPONES |
Strength: |
12-14 |
Tick if
artificial and provide details below: |
¨ |
Shape constraints: |
May have any 5-card suit |
Tick if may have
singleton: |
¨ |
Responses: |
2♣ |
Stayman [promissory] |
2♦ |
Transfer to hearts [see 2.1] |
2♥ |
Transfer to spades [see 2.1] |
2♠ |
Range ask [2NT
min, 3♣
max] |
2NT |
Transfer to a minor |
Others |
3-any is slam try |
Action after opponents double: |
Wriggle: pass forces redouble
[see 2.2]. |
Action after other interference: |
Penalty double;
Lebensohl [see 2.3] |
TWO-LEVEL OPENINGS
AND RESPONSES |
|
Meaning |
|
Responses |
|
2♣ |
8 playing
tricks any suit |
2♦ |
relay |
|
2♦ |
Game-forcing or 23+ balanced |
2♥ |
Negative |
|
2♥ |
Weak, 5-9
NV, 6-10 Vul. Usually 6-card suit. Wider-ranging in 3rd
position. |
2NT |
Ogust enquiry |
2.4 |
2♠ |
2NT |
20-22,
may contain any 5-card suit |
3♣=5-card puppet Stayman
3♦/♥
are
transfers; 3♠=4♥
& 5♠ |
2.5 |
OTHER ASPECTS OF
SYSTEM WHICH OPPONENTS SHOULD NOTE |
4-card suits are bid up
the line. |
3rd-seat openings may be stretched. |
|
|
|